Este es un interesante aporte para la construcción de una mirada amplia y abarcadora del Software Libre, que va mucho más allá de lo que puede mostrar un típico cuadro comparativo. Software Libre implica un ciclo de vida diferente del producto (el software) y un proceso de trabajo social que lo hace posible. Aquí el cómo se hace es central, porque según qué alternativa usemos, nos abrimos o cerramos posibilidades hacia adelante.
Fuente: Conocimiento Libre para una Sociedad Libre (Agosto 15, 2010 por Mariangela Petrizzo)
“Usar software libre como sistema operativo es una declaración política que indica a las corporaciones y creadores de software propietario que hay otro camino”
Este es un muy buen post escrito desde el blog “I Dream Of Linux“, está en ingés, pero vale la pena leerlo
Linux is political!
I have had so many different discussions with people about which computer operating system is the best. Most people that I talk to swear by the one they use. This generally means Windows because it comes pre-installed on people’s machines when they first buy them.
If your debate is about real technical issues, then Linux, Windows and Mac OS all have their strengths and weaknesses. It seems that all three operating systems are great to use depending on what the user needs. However, I do think that an operating system should not be judged solely on its technical strengths and weaknesses but also on its ideology and the way it is developed. This leads us into the debate of proprietary and open source software. Most people that I talk to have very little understanding about what is open source. They do not understand the concept until I further explain it to them or they research it on their own. Initially they have a lot of questions that they want answered. How can the open source community produce an operating system that is free? Who “owns” Linux? Where do I get it and how come Linux does not advertise as extensively as Apple or Microsoft? People have a hard time understanding that there is no single company behind Linux. They don’t understand that Linux cannot be monopolized like Windows or Mac OS because no single entity owns the Linux source code. When these people realize that there is much more to Linux than its technical strengths and weaknesses, then they really understand its potential to change the software industry.
Software does not have to be expensive, limiting and restrictive. Using Linux as an operating system is a political statement that tells the large corporations and the creators of restrictive proprietary software that there is a different way.